![]() Each compilation produces one version of the Vitalnet data analysis software. Task A) Repeatedly compile some 300,000 lines of source code to make an executable for running on the desktop. The details of the tasks don't exactly matter, but here they are: I measured how many seconds ("real" result from Unix time command) the task took to run. Then I did the exact same task, with exact same files but on the solid state disk (SSD). First I did the task on the hard disk drive (HDD). These are the whole reason I got the SSD, the SSD would be of no use if it did not speed up these tasks. ![]() I did a comparison on three real-world, time-consuming tasks with a lot of disk IO, that I carry out pretty often as part of my software development. But I figured I should do some tests to compare how much faster it was than the HDD. I was intrigued by getting the SSD, after reading such glowing reports. shows a typical glowing report about how great an SSD is. SSD fstab: /dev/sdb /home ext4 defaults,errors=remount-ro,noatime,nodiratime 0 1Ĭase: Cooler Master FOR-500-KKN1 Force 500ĭVD-RW: Asus DRW-24B1ST 24X (Black) (x 2) PSU: Corsair CX Series 430 Watt Power Supply CX430M SSD: Samsung 840 EVO-Series 250GB SATA III SSD (not boot disk) HDD: WD WD10EZEX 1 TB, 3.5 Inch, 7200 RPM, SATA 6, 64 MB Cache (boot disk) Supermicro X10SAE-O ATX DDR3 16 Motherboard I am hoping some linux experts can either confirm my findings, or suggest what I am missing. I recently posted a similar message to the storage forum, did not get any replies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |